Ulla Jelpke (BT-members of the party "The Left") earns for its criticism of the planned reform BKA plenty outrage. Jelpke had said: ". what's being created is secret investigating state police"
Such criticism is true, because who the BKA continually expands the powers of investigation, without the affected citizens to give legal defense, creates a "secret State police investigating . It also change the law and judges reservations nothing if not later than after investigation, the parties to limit the scope and results of investigations should be informed.
It is unfortunate that it comes in the recent debate exclusively on the pros and cons of exektutiven methods / permits, but not for the need for simultaneous development of civil rights.
The accusation that Jelpke criticism, the BKA with the Gestapo see, besides mock even the victims of the NS, despite warnings against secret police Nazi practices are the exact opposite is much more an imposition than if Jelpke actually reform ns-totalitarian subjects had assumed.
Hello Mr. Bosbach,
do you do with criticism of Nazi comparisons attention. Therefore I ask you three questions: first
Was your family in Nazi membership or Nazi spying ensnared?
second Spitz Elten you for the constitutional protection, as do many of your party-mates?
third How can the parties verify that the spy does not lie when there are at least not after the expiration of deadlines, access to the file right?
Antitotalitarische rhetoric is not credible to me, if the state as a lawyer and executive of the society gets more and more rights, but not go along the same civil rights, just to access and appeal in their own interests.
It can not and sufficient enough for me not to be well represented by privacy advocates and judges, parliamentary or enforcement if the parties are denied to know anything, that's about it.
who ousted the principal in his affairs, is to initiate a guardianship proceedings but not act as if he wanted to represent him.
Regards Mark Rabago
0 comments:
Post a Comment