The Hessian deputy Dagmar Metzger (SPD) Andrea Ypsilanti will not vote for prime minister. An SPD deputy is in the planned election for a serious illness may not participate.
55 votes (including a link) does not satisfy the majority, and it could happen that additional vote SPD deputy to Ypsilanti.
today gave Ypsilanti. - This decision is correct, the reasoning is wrong because it should not now complain about lack of party discipline, but it can be stated that it expressly for the state election promised to be without the LEFT Prime Minister want. And for their electoral success is not enough time now.
have
The Lügerei must end. And that must now be an election if the parties miscalculated with their campaign promises, because the outcome would certainly have been different if Ypsilanti had said: "If necessary, I let my government tolerated by the Left."
Perhaps then the SPD would have lost even more voters to the Left or to cook, but the SPD may obtain by fraud is not election results. A voter can
fraud can be as opposed to electoral fraud is not legally get at, so I'm for the Law, but the jurisprudence does not replace the democratic decency.
is why each MEP - which party However - all voters certainly have a duty to prevent voter fraud and not get out to talk to party discipline.
It is a tragedy that so far from the ranks of the SPD only Dagmar Metzger drew the correct conclusion.
It is a tragedy that the Left MPs to join the voter fraud wanted, because is not only a "problem of the SPD, and it helps
of community such fraud does not help suggesting that the Left previously willing to cooperate with the SPD has announced when the Left supported the voter fraud of the SPD.
must come to the election
against the call for new elections, it is argued it were accepted that the voters "have chosen wrong".
This argument does not, however, because the parties make it "wrong" when they vorschwindeln voters "inconsistencies" and therefore boycott the representative system of democracy.
from the citizens, the collective bargaining, etc. "realism" demands, but also kindly of politicians. And the various possibilities of coalitions, tolerances, were all run through before the elections and keep open to realistic power distributions according to voter's decision.
The decision makes dividing voters may oppose the parties, otherwise they tend to Unconstitutionality.
"It just depends on the content ..."
That would be correct - and governments may look for means changing majorities in parliament, but now it's just an excuse for a fraction of positive and negative coalition promises.
responsibility for democracy
What advertising of representative democracy do people like Ypsilanti? How can I explain to the extremists in our dialogue projects?
Can not. So it should not be, must have consequences in the parties: Ypsilanti has other consequences prefer to apologize for at least the attempt of voter fraud. New elections have to be. Better with time out for Ypsilanti.
And the Left should apologize that this "game" wanted to join.
It is a bitter humiliation for democracy - and just for the benefit of a master chef who does not deserve such an advantage approximate.
-Mark Rabago->> discussion
0 comments:
Post a Comment