The peace movement has three fronts and more
I researched a while before that the first strike call this ex-commanders further reactions or even contradiction in policy and media yielding. Not much. Only the "Young World" took the case to critical, but once in a way, as if nuclear weapons opponents only a problem with NATO.
refers Otherwise, the Google search 'first use of nuclear weapons "in any of the front seats still the scandalous Bundestag printed paper 14/148, with the Westerwelle & Co. open call for the first strike, the then-red-green government within NATO "isolated" add set. That was in 1998.
I replied via letter on a "Young World" article: The nuclear weapons opponents
three fronts and more
, the Russian news agency RIA Novosti reported on 19 January 2008 that the acting Chief of Staff of Russian armed forces, Yury Baluyevsky, it is "necessary consider, if necessary, to protect the sovereignty of Russia and its allies to exercise a preemptive strike with nuclear weapons." Two days later
comes out to RIA Novosti, the first-strike strategy is "not a sensation. The general had" only just set out a provision of Russia's military doctrine, adopted in early 2000 . Was "
Moreover, the U.S. plan is worse to use nuclear weapons on the battlefield -. Now, what is worse, whether" preventive "in the battlefield or" preventative "against the traditional nuclear targets, I would not discuss at this point and make a view to the NPT is no difference, but undermines it, falls short of Gorbachev, who in 1995 had unilaterally declared the renunciation of the nuclear first use.
What about the Chinese strategy, one can only speculate lack of explanations, but at least this is China accused.
North Korea's alleged, at least boastful of alleged nuclear test was to Pakistan and before India, and later Libya, that non-nuclear weapon states, in fact, given the threat posed by nuclear weapons states, or even for reasons regional superiority striving striving for nuclear weapons.
This is not to be underestimated, especially because of the conflict between India and Pakistan there have been situations in which they had switched their arsenals to infighting. - Also, Israel and France threatened on various occasions with "all means".
The nuclear weapons opponents so there's plenty fronts. Merkel and SPD are as ruler of a non-nuclear weapon state at least a duty to object to an expansion of nuclear weapons policies.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
I Have Lots Of Sticky Up Hair On My Head
KD Naumann calls nuclear first strike policy vs
are only a few know him, but he is considered the most highly decorated military since World War 2: Klaus Dieter Naumann (born 25 May 1939 in Munich) is retired general of the army, the Bundeswehr was, from 1991 to 1996 General Inspector of the Bundeswehr had and 1996 until his retirement in 1999 the chair of the NATO Military Committee.
pension protects against folly not: distribute Naumann and four other former NATO commanders, the time as "expert panel" and wrote a "report" that NATO will discuss in April: It had the first use of nuclear weapons "as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction remain in the quiver of escalation. "
Such requests run counter to Article 6 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which committed to total disarmament of all nuclear weapons, that certainly precludes the development of new nuclear strike concepts, but Naumann & Co. agree: There is "simply no realistic prospect of getting nuclear-weapon-free world "
These thugs then recommend the final break with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Mark Rabago>> discussion
are only a few know him, but he is considered the most highly decorated military since World War 2: Klaus Dieter Naumann (born 25 May 1939 in Munich) is retired general of the army, the Bundeswehr was, from 1991 to 1996 General Inspector of the Bundeswehr had and 1996 until his retirement in 1999 the chair of the NATO Military Committee.
pension protects against folly not: distribute Naumann and four other former NATO commanders, the time as "expert panel" and wrote a "report" that NATO will discuss in April: It had the first use of nuclear weapons "as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction remain in the quiver of escalation. "
Such requests run counter to Article 6 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which committed to total disarmament of all nuclear weapons, that certainly precludes the development of new nuclear strike concepts, but Naumann & Co. agree: There is "simply no realistic prospect of getting nuclear-weapon-free world "
These thugs then recommend the final break with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Mark Rabago>> discussion
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)