Bayr.Innenminister. Friedman
Bavarian Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann Friedman criticized because of his interview with the former RAF member and current right-wing extremist Horst Mahler. He was surprised that Friedman had continued the interview, although this was greeted with 'Heil Hitler'.
COMMENT
Friedman as a consumer of illegal drugs and illegal prostitution, Friedman was an affront to opponents of war - all that I criticized him, but his interview with Horst Mahler for the magazine "Vanity Fair".
There have been many interviews with Mahler, but none brought so much light on the trauma and think how it was Friedman:
Mahler's father was a convinced Nazi, could not get over the surrender and committed suicide, as Horst Mahler, 13 years old.
Such betrayal of one's family and one's own son interpreted Horst Mahler is a martyr of service to the fatherland.
Friedman's dimwitted only is his alleged ignorance of the disease in some German POW camps on as if the crimes of the Holocaust through the misery relativierbar German German misery and therefore deny. Friedman reported that
after the interview a complaint against Horst Mahler, he had made known to him immediately after the "Heil Hitler" - and it is right, because if you can not agree, then courts should decide. And hordes, which Mahler makes the "ideologues."
Mark Rabago>> discussion
Monday, November 12, 2007
Wednesday, November 7, 2007
Mount And Blade Version 1.011 Pokemon Mod
communications surveillance and "retention"
Berlin (Germany), 07.11.2007 wikinews - To stop data retention in the last minute, yesterday at least 7,000 citizens were in over 40 cities throughout Germany peacefully (as reported, the organizer of over 12,000 people [1]) on the road. In Berlin, a spontaneous chain of lights on the stairs of the Reichstag building, formed in the precincts of the police and geduldet.Anlass of the demonstrations is the coordination of the German Bundestag on 9 November on the draft law on restructuring of telecommunications surveillance. The law should make for national security from 2008 looking back over six months to trace who was with whom by phone or e-mail, on mobile phone use including the location, and who, when the Internet is used.
opinion
I am for traceability within the six month period, the law had not yet agreed ,
first long as there is no official disclosure requirement , was spied on when, why and with what consequences, results a citizen. The least would be a respondents whether they were determined. Such requirements should be complied with by authorities to also be determined deadlines.
second And what becomes of the freedom of the press if liability is not even then snoop because they can not prosecute for lack of disclosure requirement?
why this law is "NO".
-Mark Rabago-
Berlin (Germany), 07.11.2007 wikinews - To stop data retention in the last minute, yesterday at least 7,000 citizens were in over 40 cities throughout Germany peacefully (as reported, the organizer of over 12,000 people [1]) on the road. In Berlin, a spontaneous chain of lights on the stairs of the Reichstag building, formed in the precincts of the police and geduldet.Anlass of the demonstrations is the coordination of the German Bundestag on 9 November on the draft law on restructuring of telecommunications surveillance. The law should make for national security from 2008 looking back over six months to trace who was with whom by phone or e-mail, on mobile phone use including the location, and who, when the Internet is used.
opinion
I am for traceability within the six month period, the law had not yet agreed ,
first long as there is no official disclosure requirement , was spied on when, why and with what consequences, results a citizen. The least would be a respondents whether they were determined. Such requirements should be complied with by authorities to also be determined deadlines.
second And what becomes of the freedom of the press if liability is not even then snoop because they can not prosecute for lack of disclosure requirement?
why this law is "NO".
-Mark Rabago-
Friday, November 2, 2007
Usb Dongle Differences
speed limit now!
After last week, the SPD party congress a general speed limit (130 km / h) called for, should there be now for ideas of the Greens a parliamentary decisions, to ensure it becomes law, not just populist profile trial the SPD remains, because with the party decision restoring the commuter tax for short distances, it looks very much, although even with reasonable issues that create "packages" no justice.
COMMENT
I am on many roads depending on traffic situation 130 km / h is too slow. agree But I would nevertheless else is doing nothing in this direction:
A) improved road safety,
than on common roads are fast and slow vehicles only compatible within limited tolerances;
B) less energy consumption and curb the price hike,
C) less air pollution;
D) There is a speed limit for a democratic will of the majority (democracy principle). Show
LATER rectification
Experience from other countries with speed limits that this by no means the PS madness aufhört.Darum following improvements would be important: first
For Registrations, it would have power and consumption limits indicate
second for new registrations would be a cruise-duty,
third at end of life vehicles should their energy consumption by specific speed limit signs will be acknowledged at the rear, so that their drivers be required to lower consumption. Then the fat would have to travel slower cars more reasonable than the cars;
4th to all motor vehicle tours and travel writer with a three-month review requirement, what with today's satellite navigation system is easily and cheaply achieved. My Aldi Navi has eg automatic logbook and displays the speed. Regard the speeds would be enough documentation of what was in the period covered the driven speed.
Fast "Everything is possible" , it just needs more thought and political will.
-Mark Rabago->> discussion
After last week, the SPD party congress a general speed limit (130 km / h) called for, should there be now for ideas of the Greens a parliamentary decisions, to ensure it becomes law, not just populist profile trial the SPD remains, because with the party decision restoring the commuter tax for short distances, it looks very much, although even with reasonable issues that create "packages" no justice.
COMMENT
I am on many roads depending on traffic situation 130 km / h is too slow. agree But I would nevertheless else is doing nothing in this direction:
A) improved road safety,
than on common roads are fast and slow vehicles only compatible within limited tolerances;
B) less energy consumption and curb the price hike,
C) less air pollution;
D) There is a speed limit for a democratic will of the majority (democracy principle). Show
LATER rectification
Experience from other countries with speed limits that this by no means the PS madness aufhört.Darum following improvements would be important: first
For Registrations, it would have power and consumption limits indicate
second for new registrations would be a cruise-duty,
third at end of life vehicles should their energy consumption by specific speed limit signs will be acknowledged at the rear, so that their drivers be required to lower consumption. Then the fat would have to travel slower cars more reasonable than the cars;
4th to all motor vehicle tours and travel writer with a three-month review requirement, what with today's satellite navigation system is easily and cheaply achieved. My Aldi Navi has eg automatic logbook and displays the speed. Regard the speeds would be enough documentation of what was in the period covered the driven speed.
Fast "Everything is possible" , it just needs more thought and political will.
-Mark Rabago->> discussion
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)